Dynamic vs. Static Typing in Coding Languages: What’s the Difference?

What is the main difference between dynamic and static typing in coding?

Dynamic and static typing are two ways of defining the types of variables and values in a programming language. The main difference is that dynamically typed languages perform type-checking during execution. Statically typed languages, in contrast, perform type checking at compile time, that is, before run-time.

For example, Phyton or Groovy are considered dynamically typed languages. That means they only translate and type-check the code they are executing on. Some errors in the code may be ignored if the line with the error never executes. In contrast, Java or Go are statically typed languages. If a script contains type errors, it will fail to work until the errors have been fixed.

Another thing to mention is that statically typed languages require you to declare the data types of your variables before you use them. If you use dynamically typed languages, you don’t have to declare the types. That makes dynamically typed languages more flexible and can save time and space.

However, dynamic typing allows variables to change types and sometimes creates unexpected errors. Static typing, in turn, catches errors early but doesn’t offer much stability.

Coding, software development – associative photo. Image credit: Pxfuel, free license

Dynamic vs. Static typic in coding languages: Illustration by example

As we already mentioned, static typing means that the type of a variable is declared and checked at compile time, while dynamic typing means that the type of a variable is determined and checked at run time.

For example, in a statically typed language like Java, you have to write:

int x = 10; // x is an integer
String y = "Hello"; // y is a string

But in a dynamically typed language like Python, you can write:

x = 10 # x can be anything
y = "Hello" # y can be anything

Dynamic vs Static typing: Which one is better?

There is no definitive answer to which one is better, as it depends on the preferences and needs of the programmer or the developer team, and the project itself.

Choosing between dynamic and static typing in coding depends on various factors, and neither option is universally better than the other. Both dynamic and static typing have their advantages and drawbacks. Let’s compare these two methods in detail, by emphasizing each other’s strong and weak points:

Dynamic typing

Dynamic typing allows for flexibility as variable types are determined at runtime. This means developers can change the type of a variable during execution, making it adaptable to different data types. Dynamic typing is often associated with languages like Python and JavaScript.

Advantages of Dynamic Typing:

1. Flexibility: Dynamic typing allows developers to write more flexible and concise code as they don’t need to explicitly declare variable types.
2. Rapid Development: It promotes quicker development cycles, making it well-suited for prototyping and scripting.

Drawbacks of Dynamic Typing:

1. Runtime Errors: Since type checking occurs during runtime, errors related to type mismatches may not be caught until the program is executed.
2. Readability: Code readability may suffer as the types of variables are not explicitly stated in the code.

Static typing

Static typing requires developers to declare variable types explicitly before compiling the code. Languages like Java, C++, and TypeScript follow static typing principles.

Advantages of Static Typing:

1. Early Error Detection: Type errors are caught at compile-time, providing early detection and reducing the likelihood of runtime errors.
2. Code Readability: Explicitly defined types make the code more readable and can serve as documentation.

Drawbacks of Static Typing:

1. Verbose Code: Code can become more verbose due to the need for explicit type declarations, potentially slowing down development.
2. Learning Curve: For developers new to statically typed languages, there may be a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing type annotations.

Ultimately, the choice between dynamic and static typing depends on project requirements, team preferences, and the nature of the development process. Some projects may benefit from the flexibility of dynamic typing, while others may prioritize the early error detection and readability offered by static typing.

You should also know that many modern coding languages and frameworks offer a middle ground, allowing for optional or gradual typing to strike a balance between flexibility and type safety.

Developing software – illustrative photo. Image credit: ThisisEngineering RAEng via Unsplash, free license

Wrapping up